REGRET,
SATISFACTION AND SYMPTOM IMPROVEMENT: ANALYSIS OF THE IMPACT OF
COLPOCLEISIS FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF SEVERE PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE.
T.L. Wheeler II, H.E. Richter, R.E.
Varner, K.L. Burgio, DT. Redden, P.S. Goode,
C.G. Chen
Medical-Surgical
Oncology, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess a cohort of patients
having undergone a colpocleisis procedure greater than one year post operation
to determine: 1) the proportion of patients who regretted having the
procedure 2) patient satisfaction with the procedure and 3) changes in symptom
severity following surgery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 54 candidates who underwent colpocleisis between March
1998 and April 2003 were identified from the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) Genitourinary Disorders database.
From August to October of 2004, participants were contacted by an
investigator not involved with the surgery and were asked 1) “do you regret
having your surgery, and, if so, why?” 2) “how satisfied are you with
your progress (completely, somewhat, or not)?” and 3) to complete the short
form Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI). The satisfaction question has
been previously validated. Baseline UDI values were obtained
preoperatively. Improvement on the UDI (baseline versus last interview)
was tested using the dependent t-test. Wilcoxon Rank Sum was used to test
for the effect of concomitant incontinence procedure on UDI change.
Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient was used to correlate change in UDI
scores with time since procedure and age.
RESULTS: Nineteen of the 54 candidates were excluded (8 deceased, 6
demented and 5 lost to follow-up). Three candidates declined any
participation. Thirty-two participants responded to the regret question.
Twenty-eight of these participants answered the satisfaction question and
repeated the UDI. Mean age at follow up was 81.4(±5.0) years, and
follow-up interval was 26.5 (±12.9) months. Three
participants (9.32%) regretted having colpocleisis performed. Two
participants gave recurrent prolapse (5 and 7 months post operation) as the
reason for regret, while one participant, without recurrent prolapse, who had a
concomitant modified Pereyra, cited continued urinary leakage as the reason for
regret. No participant cited loss of sexual function as a reason for regret.
Fifty seven percent (16/28) were completely satisfied, 29% somewhat and
14% (4/28) not satisfied. Mean UDI score improved significantly from 63.4
(±23.9) at baseline to 24.2(±26.7) at last
interview (p<0.001). A concomitant incontinence procedure did not significantly
effect change in UDI scores (p= 0.4378). There was a negative correlation
between change in UDI scores with time since procedure (r= -0.40, p= 0.0527)
and age (r= -0.44, p=.033).
CONCLUSION:
Patients report minimal regret, significant satisfaction and symptom
improvement more than a year post surgery. Smaller improvements were
reported with longer time from surgery and increasing age.
Key Words:
colpocleisis, regret, satisfaction, outcomes
Disclosure – Speakers Bureau: H. Richter, Pfizer, Novartis; R.E. Varner, Pfizer, Gynecare; P.S. Goode, Lilly, Ortho-McNeil, Pfizer; Consultant: K.L. Burgio, Lilly, Ortho-McNeil, Novartis, Yamanouchi, Merck.