FECAL AND URINARY INCONTINENCE FOLLOWING VAGINAL DELIVERY WITH ANAL
SPHINCTER DISRUPTION
D. Fenner, MD, R. Gensberg MS, P. Kartha BA, J. DeLancey MD
Objective: To estimate the incidence of bowel and urinary
incontinence as it relates to anal sphincter laceration in primiparous women,
and to identify factors that are associated with anal sphincter laceration.
Methods: From Jan 1, 1997 to March 30, 2000, 2941
primiparous women that delivered vaginally at the University of Michigan Medical
Center and were mailed questionnaires concerning bowel and bladder function six
months following delivery as part of an IRB approved study of postpartum urinary
incontinence. Charts were reviewed for demographic and pertinent delivery
variables. Perineal trauma was classified as no lacerations, first, second,
third (partial or complete) or fourth degree lacerations found during
childbirth. Information about delivery in 2855 women was analyzed. There were 86
women excluded from further analysis for having both vacuum and forceps delivery
(9), missing charts (52) or pudendal block (25). There were 943 women who
completed the urinary function questionnaire, and 831 women that completed the
bowel function questionnaire. Univariant analysis was performed on all
covariates. Multiple logistic regression was used for further analysis with the
presence of third or fourth degree lacerations as the outcome.
Results: Third or fourth degree lacerations occurred
in 506 deliveries (17.70%). Nearly one fifth (19.86%) of the women who completed
the survey had sustained third or fourth degree lacerations. The women in the
sphincter laceration group were more likely (23.03%) to have bowel incontinence
than women in the control group (13.36%). The incidence of worse bowel control
was nearly ten times higher in women with fourth degree lacerations (30.8%),
when compared to women with third degree lacerations (3.60%). Macrosomia (OR
2.19; CI 1.61, 2.99), forceps assisted delivery (OR 4.75; CI 3.43, 6.57), and
vacuum assisted delivery (OR 3.51; CI 2.64, 4.66) were associated with higher
risks of third and fourth degree lacerations. Midline (OR 2.24; CI 1.81, 2.77)
but not mediolateral (OR 0.66; CI 0.375, 1.19) episiotomy was associated with
anal sphincter lacerations. Prolonged second stage of labor (P= 0.107), and use
of epidural anesthesia (P= 0.150) did not prove to have significant associations
with anal sphincter lacerations. Over half of women said their bladder function
deteriorated after delivery (slightly worse (32.56%) or worse (27.57%). They
also reported lifestyle modifications associated with urinary incontinence.
Conclusions: Women with third and fourth degree lacerations
were more likely to have bowel incontinence than women without anal sphincter
lacerations. Most notable, women with fourth degree lacerations were nearly ten
times more likely to have worse bowel function than women with third degree
lacerations. Anal sphincter lacerations are strongly associated with macrosomia,
forceps and vacuum assisted delivery, and midline episiotomy. Decreased urinary
control was present in greater than half of the primiparous women surveyed.
Key Words: Fecal and Urinary Incontinence following vaginal
delivery