VAGINAL PARAVAGINAL DEFECT REPAIR WITH AN ALLODERM GRAFT
J. Clemons, MD, V. Aguilar, MD, L. Arya, MD, D. Myers, MD
Objective: The purpose of this study was to describe
outcomes of a technique of vaginal paravaginal defect repair using Alloderm (Lifecell
Corp. Woodlands, Texas) graft material in women with or recurrent Stage 2 or
primary or recurrent Stage 3 / 4 anterior vaginal wall prolapse.
Methods: This was a prospective observational study. Between
November 1998 and April 2002, 33 women underwent a vaginal paravaginal defect
repair using Alloderm graft. Demographic data was recorded. The descent of the
anterior vaginal wall was graded using the POP-Q system preoperatively and every
6 months post-operatively. Recurrence of prolapse, voiding dysfunction, and
post-operative complications were recorded. Life-table analysis evaluated
recurrence of prolapse. Odds ratios were used to identify risk factors for
complications or recurrence of prolapse.
Results: Thirty-one of the 33 women were Caucasian. The mean
age was 65.2 years (range 42-83) and mean parity was 2.8 (range 1-6). Thirty
women were post-menopausal and 21 used estrogen replacement therapy. Twenty-nine
(88%) women had a prior hysterectomy, and 19 (58%) had prior surgery for pelvic
organ prolapse. Pre-operatively, 6 women had recurrent stage 2, 24 women had
stage 3, and 3 women had stage 4 anterior vaginal wall prolapse. Twenty-five
(76%) women underwent concurrent pelvic reconstructive procedures. The mean EBL
was 378 ml and there were no transfusions. Only one woman has been lost to
follow-up due to death secondary to congestive heart failure.
The median length of follow-up is 18 months. Post-operatively, 13 women
developed asymptomatic stage 2 (not beyond the hymen) anterior vaginal wall
prolapse, and one woman developed symptomatic stage 2 prolapse (point Aa +1 cm)
with stress incontinence at 28 months. Life-table analysis of the post-operative
6-month interval exams demonstrated that the cumulative probability of the
anterior vaginal wall remaining at stage 0-1 was .76 at 1 year and .50 at 2, 3,
and 4 years. There were no identifiable risk factors for the development of
stage 2-asymptomatic prolapse.
Seven women (21%) had urinary retention more than seven days. The placement of
the Tension-free Vaginal Tape sling along with the Alloderm graft increased the
risk of post-op urinary retention (odds ratio 7.3, 95% confidence interval 1.2,
46.1). Complications included: one case of febrile morbidity, one cystotomy, and
one anterior wall breakdown secondary to hematoma formation due to heparin
therapy. No other erosions or rejections were seen.
Conclusion: A vaginal paravaginal defect repair with
Alloderm graft material in women with recurrent stage 2 or stage 3 / 4 anterior
vaginal wall prolapse is safe and has good results within the first 2 years.
Key Words: graft, reconstructive surgery, prolapse